Hi Everyone,
As everyone gears up for spring 2016 and our 35th painting season, we wanted to do
another post about hand painting fence. As we previously mentioned in a lot of
"small job" cases it is easier and more efficient to complete your
fence painting job with rollers as opposed to spraying.
That being said we have finally found and are stocking what
we think is the perfect roller for equine and agriculture fence work. We now
carry 7" thick nap rollers, frames, and bucket grids. We chose the
heaviest roller frame we could find. We believe these will stand up to the
abuse of painting fence.
The benefit of 7" over 9" is less wasted roller
resulting in more paint getting on the fence rather than on you and the ground.
7" rollers allow you to cover the entire board at once without having to
double stroke as you would with a smaller roller.
We have seen over the years that thick nap rollers are far
superior to shorter nap rollers and brushes. Our roller covers have a 1
1/4" thick nap. These allow you to paint virtually the entire fence
without picking up a brush, saving time and energy. This nap allows you to jab
the roller around all areas of the posts, especially on the backside of where
the boards meet the post. The thick nap also allows fewer strokes to cover the
entire post as the roller moves more freely to match the contour of the post.
It is important to note that rough sawed fence lumber is
hard on roller covers. The wood fibers are very apt to pull and tug at roller
covers shortening their life. Do not expect one roller cover to last all day.
These rollers are the most cost effective way of DIY
painting. We chose to carry this line of roller covers and frames based on
customer feedback. Everyone seemed to like the product test last fall. Call
us or stop by for pricing, you can’t beat our paint quality or prices anywhere
and we are confident we have the best bang for your buck hand painting
equipment out there as well.
Thanks everyone for the continued business and we look forward to serving you into the future.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete